A submissives journey

 

 

 

Chapter 1
The Asj Community


Chapter 2
Resource Information 

 

 

Chapter 3
Subbie's Couch

 

Chapter 4
The Dom's Lounge


Chapter 5

 The Library

 

 

 

Chapter 6
BDSM

 

 

Chapter 7

 Useful Links

 

 

 

Chapter 8
Members share their thoughts

 

 

Chapter 9

 Members Only

 

 

 

Chapter 10
Asj's Site Index

 

 

Chapter 11
Asj's Online Store

 

 

 

Chapter 12
Recommended Reading List

 

 

Chapter 13
Asj submissive slave register

 

 

Your Donation Supports this Site

 

 

 

 

 

  •  

     
  •  

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 


 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The illusion of control

 

 I posed a question in chat recently regarding a collared  submissive's right to say "no" to Master/Mistress.  As I

 suspected, it elicited a spirited discussion and a variety of

 opinions.  I too have an opinion, and while it is no more valid

 than A/anyone E/else's, I thought it had the makings of a good

 posting.

 

 Control of a submissive is an illusion.  There, I said it.  I'll take a

 few minutes and let many of Y/you regain Y/your composure. 

 That long enough?  Ok, I'll explain.

 

 It seems that most people have a good grasp on the many

 specifics regarding D/s philosophy.  Most are aware of safe,

 sane and consensual.  Most are aware of a submissive's rights. 

 Most are generally aware of the expectations attached to the

 role of Dominant and submissive in a relationship.  In short,

 most see the trees.  But how do these disparate notions make

 themselves into a forest, especially when many of the concepts

 may appear to be contradictory?

 

 For purpose of this article I wish to dispense with refusals

 surrounding limits and safety.  Those are situations in which

 submissives are universally expected to express their free will

 to say "no" in order to protect themselves.  However, there are

 other times in which a submissive may say "no" to a

 Dominant's request, when their safety or limits are not at issue.

 

 In answer to My question in the chat room, many said that the

 submissive could not say "no" to areas of his/her life that had

 been given in submission to Master/Mistress.  Still, they

 recognized that a submissive has free will, and submission

 must be given freely.  Many said that a Dominant should "force"

 Their wishes upon a submissive.  Yet they recognized that

 force was tantamount to abuse, for it would no longer be

 consensual.  Some pointed out that submissives should

 properly identify the areas of their lives in which submission

 was offered.  But as humans, there are times in which

 submissives will change their minds.  They have the right and

 free will to do so.  Most thought that some sort of punishment

 would be in order.  But punishment that is forced upon an

 unwilling submissive is also abuse.

 

 How then, do W/we reconcile these contradictory elements of a

 D/s relationship?  W/who has the control?  How can a

 submissive have free will, and yet be made to comply with the

 wishes of their Dominant?  How can a Dominant "impose"

 Their will upon an unwilling submissive, without being

 abusive?

 

 First and foremost, let's recognize what the origin of that

 "control" is.  It is the “power exchange”.  It is the free will of the

 submissive.  A submissive willingly accepts control, or there is

 no control at all.  That submission is, as W/we A/all know,

 earned by virtue of love, respect, honesty, and all of the

 elements of a relationship that are necessary for one to offer

 such a glorious gift to One that has demonstrated Their

 worthiness.  Those elements will of course differ from

 individual to individual, but the important concept is that they

 must be present before a submissive can or will offer their

 submission.

 

 But submission is not a light switch.  It is not all or nothing.  It is

 not on or off.  There are an infinite number of gradients in

 between.  And a submissive may be at any one of those infinite

 points on any given day, and prone to change.  So in order to

 help conceptualize what submission is, consider it to be similar

 to a dimmer switch, rather than an on/off switch.  The light is

 turned on gradually, or off gradually.  The submission may vary

 from day to day.  What was agreeable yesterday, may not be

 agreeable today.  What was offered in submission today, may

 be more or less than what is offered tomorrow.  The trick, then,

 is to help him/her to want to submit consistently.

 

  As that level of submission brightens or dims, so does the

 "control" of the Dominant.  The Dominant has only the control

 that is given by the submissive at that moment.  No more, no

 less.  Attempt to take more and You have a fight on Your

 hands.  Along with the resulting anger, frustration and

 resentment.  Accept only what is offered You as a Dominant,

 and You are not fulfilling Your obligations to guide and achieve

 personal or lifestyle growth.

 

 Gosh, what's a poor Dominant to do?

 

 Several people involved in the conversation recognized that

 there may be a good reason for a submissive to say "no".  But

 what seems like a good reason to a submissive, may not seem

 so great to a Dominant.  They did suggest discussing the

 underlying reasons for saying "no", and I wholeheartedly

 agree.  I would strongly suggest finding some time to sit down

 and discuss things in a level, dispassionate manner.  Perhaps

 Y/you might find one of the following situations apply:

 

  • There are times when submissives test limits of acceptable behavior, or self determination.  It is up to the Dominant to apply those limits consistently.

  • Moods change from day to day.  W/we get up on the right side or the wrong side of the bed sometimes.  That can’t be helped.  What can be helped is how W/we respond to O/others around U/us, even if W/we’re not feeling all that great.

  • The submissive may have issues that he/she would like to discuss, but can’t decide how to start the conversation.  Sometimes an argument serves the purpose of being a catalyst.

  • Submission is rather like the ocean, with tides that come and go in an eternal ebb and flow.  It may simply indicate that the cycle is reaching “low tide” again.  That’s not a reason for this to be acceptable behavior, but a recognition that Dominants are charged with helping submissives with the kind of personal and lifestyle growth that enhances submission, bringing the tide back in.

  • Some submissives use confrontation as a form of self-punishment.  Perhaps there is underlying guilt for some other transgression that diligent questioning will reveal.

  • There may be a lack of motivation.  At times submissives need help in realizing the progress they’ve made, or be reminded of their personal and lifestyle goals.

  • There are submissives that occasionally enjoy the confrontation, and resultant “punishment” or discipline.

 Of course, understanding the underlying reasons for saying

 “no” is easier than determining how to respond.  There are no

 hard and fast rules to refer to in “The Dominant Handbook”. 

 Frankly, being a Master/Mistress is more of an art form than

 science.

 

 If it were a simple matter of imposing some punishment for the

 refusal, there probably wouldn’t be a problem in the first place. 

 Simply put, if a submissive refuses a request, it’s highly likely

 that they would refuse punishment for the refusal as well.  And I

 caution You Dominants here, if You press the issue forcefully,

 You run the risk of completely losing the respect and

 submission of Your one.

 

 Here, I believe, is need for a critical distinction in the role of a

 Dominant.  The distinction between “commanding” and

 “guiding”.

 

 If W/we are to consider submissives as no more than robotic

 Stepford wives & husbands, then commanding would be both

 effective and efficient.  But they’re not.  submissives are

 complex human beings.  Command as some sort of despot and

 You’re likely to find a rebellion on Your hands as the

 submissive exercises his/her free will to resist a stifling and

 demeaning relationship.  To be sure, there are some

 relationships that will not survive frequent problems like this,

 nor should they.  But let’s assume it’s a good, healthy

 relationship that deserves the effort to solve the problem.

 

 Again I ask, what’s a poor Dominant to do?

 

 First, don’t get angry.  Remain composed and in control of

 Yourself and Your emotions.  Self-control, appearing to be in

 control, is the first step to being in control.

 

 Next, determine when would be the best time to discuss the

 matter.  It may be tempting to do so immediately, but that may

 not be effective.  The time and place of that discussion will have

 a direct bearing on how much information is shared with You,

 and therefore on how successful it will be.  Remember, while

 You may be in control of Your emotions, Your submissive may

 not be.

 

 I also try to remember that any “punishment” or discipline is

 supposed to be a learning experience.  If We approach Our role

 of Master/Mistress as a guide, We can see that the best learning

 experience is to allow Our submissives to make mistakes. 

 That’s human nature.  W/we are A/all given copious amounts of

 advice, and still W/we do as W/we please, make the same

 mistakes as O/others made before U/us, and then learn from

 them.  W/we learn because O/our mistakes have consequences

 and W/we have to live with those consequences.  Sometimes

 We just have to let them err on their own.  Saying “no” amongst

 them.

 

 So, My advice to Dominants in this situation is to let Your

 submissive learn from the consequences of his/her actions. 

 Find what the natural result of those actions are, and that will

 be the “punishment” or discipline.  For purpose of example, I’ll

 share a quick story here.  I had a submissive that desired to

 stay late at a party W/we attended.  When I desired to go, she

 said “no”.  I didn’t get angry.  I didn’t rant or rave.  I could see

 that her mind was made up, and so, W/we stayed.  When W/we

 returned home and she desired to play, but W/we had no

 time for play.  That time had been spent at the party.  The

 natural consequence of her spending extra time at the party

 was that there was less time to do something else.  And so, the

 lesson is learned.

 

 This kind of lesson is not a confrontation.  It is just the natural

 course of things given the decision the submissive has made. 

 It is not a test of wills, and won’t engender animosity or

 resentment.  True, it may be frustrating to the submissive.  But

 the frustration is that he/she failed to consider the

 consequences of their decision, frustration with their own

 decision and not Yours.  It is a very effective learning tool.  The

 submissive learns that You as Dominant have the “big picture”

 in mind, You have their best interest in mind, and Your requests

 are proven to be worthy of his/her submission to them.

 

 And let’s recall that many submissives can be very self-critical. 

 If You don’t give them the fight they seek, if You keep Your

 composure and maintain control of Yourself, You may find that

 guilt gets the better of them.  And while You may naturally ask if

 this is proper, submissives “punishing” themselves, keep in

 mind that You are making that decision.  And as such, the

 punishment or discipline is Yours.

 

 Reassure Your submissive that it’s ok to make mistakes.  That

 it’s ok to be human.  Reassure him/her that they are still loved,

 that Y/your relationship is undamaged.  Demonstrate that love

 with hugs and kisses.  Remind them that as Master/Mistress, it

 is Your obligation to offer guidance, to promote personal and

 lifestyle growth, and to make it the kind of guidance that is

 willingly accepted because it is good and right for him/her. 

 Remind them that You are only fulfilling Your obligations within

 the lifestyle role of Master/Mistress, and to him/her personally.

 

 I’ve found that the offer of guidance, the maintenance of

 self-control, the reassurance that it’s ok to make mistakes and

 be human, and the reminder of the obligations of Your role as

 Master/Mistress has a far greater impact than the threat of

 force.  After all, it always boils down to a submissive’s free will

 and choice.  Ask Yourself, which kind of Master/Mistress would

 You want to submit to?

Rover«§» 


Copyright 2001

Questions about the Asj web site?   Click the ask live icon to chat live or leave a message with our site host.  CJ isn't always available, but generally you can find Him here from about 8:30 - 11:00 pm Eastern time. Your questions about the site, the Asj community or just about the lifestyle in general are always welcome.  If nothing else, take a moment and tell us what you think of this feature!  

 

 

Live Chat Help

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2002 - 2010 [A submissives journey]. All rights reserved.
Revised: October 19, 2011