The Medical Realities of
Breath Control Play
Copyright © 1997 by Jay Wiseman, author of SM 101: A Realistic
Introduction.
All rights reserved. ~ (posted here with
permission of the author)
For
some time now, I have felt that the practices of suffocation and/or strangulation done in an erotic context
(generically known as breath control play; more properly known as asphyxiophilia)
were in fact far more dangerous than they are generally perceived to
be. As a person with years of medical education and experience, I
know of no way whatsoever that either suffocation or strangulation
can be done in a way that does not intrinsically put the recipient
at risk of cardiac arrest. (There are also numerous additional risks;
more on them later.) Furthermore, and my *biggest* concern, I
know of no reliable way to determine when such a cardiac arrest has
become imminent.
Often
the first detectable sign that an arrest is approaching is the
arrest
itself. Furthermore, if the recipient does arrest, the probability
of
resuscitating them, even with optimal CPR, is distinctly small. Thus the
recipient is dead and their partner, if any, is in a very perilous legal
situation. (The authorities could consider such deaths first-degree
murders until proven otherwise, with the burden of such proof being
on the defendant). There are also the real and major concerns of
the surviving partner's own life-long remorse to having caused such a
death, and the trauma to the friends and family members of both parties.
Some breath
control fans say that what they do is acceptably safe because
they do not take what they do up to the point of unconsciousness.
I find this statement worrisome for two reasons: (1) You can't
really know when a person is about to go unconscious until they
actually do so, thus it's extremely difficult to know where the actual
point of unconsciousness is until you actually reach it.
(2) More importantly,
unconsciousness is a symptom, not a condition in and of itself.
It has numerous underlying causes ranging from simple fainting to cardiac
arrest, and which of these will cause the unconsciousness cannot be
known in advance.
I have
discussed my concerns regarding breath control with well over a dozen
SM-positive physicians, and with numerous other SM positive
health professionals, and all share my concerns. We have discussed
how breath control might be done in a way that is not life- threatening,
and come up blank. We have discussed how the risk might be
significantly reduced, and come up blank. We have discussed
how it might be determined that an arrest is imminent, and come up
blank.
Indeed, so
far not one (repeat, not one) single physician, nurse,
paramedic,
chiropractor, physiologist, or other person with
substantial
training in how a human body works has been willing to
step forth
and teach a form of breath control play that they are willing to assert
is acceptably safe -- i.e., does not put the recipient at imminent,
unpredictable risk of dying. I believe this fact makes a major
statement.
Other "edge
play" topics such as suspension bondage, electricity
play,
cutting, piercing, branding, enemas, water sports, and scat play can and
have been taught with reasonable safety, but not breath control
play. Indeed, it seems that the more somebody knows about how a human
body works, the more likely they are to caution people about how
dangerous breath control is, and about how little can be done to
reduce the degree of risk.
In
many ways, oxygen is to the human body, and particularly to the
heart and
brain, what oil is to a car's engine. Indeed, there's a
medical
adage that goes "hypoxia (becoming dangerously low on
oxygen) not
only stops the motor, but also wrecks the engine."
Therefore,
asking how one can play safely with breath control is very similar to
asking how one can drive a car safely while draining it of oil.
Some
people tell the "mechanics" something like, "Well, I'm going to drain my
car of oil anyway, and I'm not going to keep track of how low the oil
level is getting while I'm driving my car, so tell me how to do this with
as much safety as possible." (They may even add something like
"Hey, I always shut the engine off before it catches fire.") They then get
frustrated when the mechanics scratch their heads and say that they
don't know. They may even label such mechanics as "anti-education."
A
bit about my background may help explain my concerns. I was an ambulance
crewman for over eight years. I attended medical school for three
years, and passed my four-year boards, (then ran out of money).
I am a former member of the American Academy of Family Physicians
and a former American Heart Association instructor in Advanced
Cardiac Life Support. I have an extensive martial arts background
that includes a first-degree black belt in Tae Kwon Do. My martial
arts training included several months of judo that involved both my
choking and being choked.
I
have been an instructor in first aid, CPR, and various advanced emergency
care techniques for over sixteen years. My students have included
physicians, nurses, paramedics, police officers, fire fighters, wilderness
emergency personnel, martial artists, and large numbers of ordinary
citizens. I currently offer both basic and advanced first aid and CPR
training to the SM community.
During
my ambulance days, I responded to at least one call involving the death
of a young teenage boy who died from autoerotic strangulation,
and to several other calls where this was suspected but could not
be confirmed. (Family members often "sanitize" such scenes
before calling 911.) Additionally, I personally know two members of
my local SM community who went to prison after their partners
died during breath control play.
The primary
danger of suffocation play is that it is not a condition that gets worse
over time (regarding the heart, anyway, it does get worse over time
regarding the brain). Rather, what happens is that the more the play is
prolonged, the greater the odds that a cardiac arrest will occur.
Sometimes even one minute of suffocation can cause this; sometimes
even less.
Quick
pathophysiology lesson # 1: When the heart gets low on
oxygen, it
starts to fire off "extra" pacemaker sites. These usually
appear in
the ventricles and are thus called premature ventricular
contractions
-- PVC's for short. If a PVC happens to fire off during the electrical repolarization phase of cardiac contraction (the dreaded "PVC on T"
phenomenon, also sometimes called "R on T") it can kick the heart
over into ventricular fibrillation -- a form of cardiac arrest. The lower
the heart gets on oxygen, the more PVC's it generates, and the
more vulnerable to their effect it becomes, thus hypoxia increases
both the probability of a PVC-on-T occurring and of its causing a
cardiac arrest.
When
this will happen to a particular person in a particular session is simply not
predictable. This is exactly where most of the medical
people I
have discussed this topic with "hit the wall." Virtually all
medical
folks know that PVC's are both life-threating and hard to
detect
unless the patient is hooked to a cardiac monitor. When
medical
folks discuss breath control play, the question quickly
becomes:
How can you tell when they start throwing PVC's? The
answer is:
You basically can't.
Quick
pathophysiology lesson # 2: When breathing is restricted, the body cannot
eliminate carbon dioxide as it should, and the amount of carbon
dioxide in the blood increases. Carbon dioxide (CO2) and water (H2O)
exist in equilibrium with what's called carbonic acid (H2CO3) in
a reaction catalyzed by an enzyme called carbonic anhydrase.
(Sorry, but I can't do subscripts in this program.)
Thus:
CO2 + H2O <carbonic anhydrase> H2CO3
A molecule
of carbonic acid dissociates on its own into a molecule of what's
called bicarbonate (HCO3-) and an (acidic) hydrogen ion.
(H+)
Thus:
H2CO3 <> HCO3- and H+
Thus
the overall pattern is:
H2O + CO2 <> H2CO3 <> HCO3-
+ H+
Therefore,
if breathing is restricted, CO2 builds up and the reaction shifts to the
right in an
attempt to balance things out, ultimately making the
blood more acidic and thus decreasing its pH. This is called
respiratory acidosis. (If the patient hyper-ventilates, they "blow off CO2"
and the reaction shifts to the left, thus increasing the pH. This is
called respiratory alkalosis, and has its own dangers.)
Quick
pathophysiology lesson # 3:
Again,
if breathing is restricted, not only does carbon dioxide have a hard time
getting out, but oxygen also has a hard time getting in. A molecule of
glucose (C6H12O6) breaks down within the cell by a
process
called glycolysis into two molecules of pyruvate, thus
creating a
small amount of ATP for the body to use as energy. Under normal
circumstances, pyruvate quickly combines with oxygen to produce a
much larger amount of ATP. However, if there's not enough
oxygen to properly metabolize the pyruvate, it is converted to lactic acid
and produces one form of what's called a metabolic acidosis.
As
you can see, either a build-up in the blood of carbon dioxide or a decrease in
the blood of oxygen will cause the pH of the blood to fall. If both
occur at the same time, as they do in cases of suffocation, the pH of the
blood will plummet to life-threatening levels within a very few minutes.
The pH of normal human blood is in the 7.35 to 7.45 range (slightly
alkaline). A pH falling to 6.9 (or raising to 7.8) is "incompatible
with life."
Past
experience, either with others or with that same person, is not
particularly
useful. Carefully watching their level of consciousness,
skin color,
and pulse rate is of only limited value. Even hooking the
bottom up
to both a pulse oximeter and a cardiac monitor (assuming you had
either piece of equipment, and they're not cheap) would be of only
limited additional value.
While an
experienced clinician can sometimes detect PVC's by
feeling the
patient's pulse, in reality the only reliable way to detect
them is to
hook the patient up to a cardiac monitor. The problem is that each
PVC is potentially lethal, particularly if the heart is low on oxygen.
Even if you "ease up" on the bottom immediately, there's no telling
when the PVC's will stop. They could stop almost at once, or they could
continue for hours.
In addition
to the primary danger of cardiac arrest, there is good
evidence to
document that there is a very real risk of cumulative brain damage if
the practice is repeated often enough. In particular,
laboratory
studies of repeated brief interruption of blood flow to the
brains of
animals and studies of people with what's called "sleep
apnea
syndrome" (in which they stop breathing for up to two minutes while
sleeping) document that cumulative brain damage does occur in such
cases.
There are
many documented additional dangers. These include, but are _not_
limited to: rupture of the windpipe, fracture of the larynx, damage to
the blood vessels in the neck, dislodging a fatty plaque in a neck
artery which then travels to the brain and causes a stroke, damage to
the cervical spine, seizures, airway obstruction by the tongue, and
aspiration of vomitus. Additionally, there are documented cases in
which the recipient appeared to fully recover but was found dead
several hours later.
The
American Psychiatric Association estimates a death rate of one person per
year per million of population -- thus about 250 deaths last year in the
U.S. Law enforcement estimates go as much as four times
higher. Most such deaths occur during solo play, however there are many
documented cases of deaths that occurred during play with a partner.
It should be noted that the presence of a partner does nothing to
limit the primary danger, and does little or nothing to limit most of the
secondary dangers.
Some people
teach that choking can be safely done if pressure on
the
windpipe is avoided. Their belief is that pressing on the arteries leading to
the brain while avoiding pressure on the windpipe can safely
cause unconsciousness. The reality, unfortunately, is that pressing on
the carotid arteries, exactly as they recommend, presses on
baroreceptors known as the carotid sinus bodies. These bodies then
cause vasodilation in the brain, thus there is not enough blood to
perfuse the brain and the recipient loses consciousness. However,
that's not the whole story.
Unfortunately,
a message is also sent to the main pacemaker of the heart, via
the vagus nerve, to decrease the rate and force of the
heartbeat.
Most of the time, under strong vagal influence, the rate and force of
the heartbeat decreases by one third. However, every now and then,
the rate and force decreases to zero and the bottom
"flatlines"
into asystole --another, and more difficult to treat, form of
cardiac
arrest. There is no way to tell whether or not this will happen in any
particular instance, or how quickly. There are many
documented
cases of as little as five seconds of choking causing a vagal-outlfow-induced
cardiac arrest.
For the
reason cited above, many police departments have now
either
entirely banned the use of choke holds or have reclassified
them as a
form of deadly force. Indeed, a local CHP (California
Highway
Patrol) officer recently had a $250,000 judgment brought
against him
after a nonviolent suspect died while being choked by
him.
Finally, as
a CPR instructor myself, I want to caution that knowing
CPR does
little to make the risk of death from breath control play
significantly
smaller. While CPR can and should be done, understand that the
probability of success is likely to be less than 10%.
I'm not
going to state that breath control is something that nobody
should ever
do under any circumstances. I have no problem with
informed,
freely consenting people taking any degree of risk they
wish. I am
going to state that there is a great deal of ignorance
regarding
what actually happens to a body when it's suffocated or
strangled,
and that the actual degree of risk associated with these
practices
is far greater than most people believe.
I have
noticed that, when people are educated regarding the severity and
unpredictability of the risks, fewer and fewer choose to play in this area,
and those who do continue tend to play less often. I also notice
that, because of its severe and unpredictable risks, more and more SM
party-givers are banning any form of breath control play at their
events.
If you'd
like to look into this matter further, here are some references to get you
started:
-
Emergency Care in the
Streets by
Caroline (I'd recommend starting here.)
-
Medical Physiology
by Guyton
-
The Pathologic Basis
of Disease
by Robbins
-
Textbook of Advanced
Cardiac Life Support
by American Heart Association
-
The Physiology
Coloring Book
by Kapit, Macey, and Meisami
-
Forensic Pathology
by DeMaio and Demaio
-
Autoerotic Fatalities
by Hazelwood
-
Melloni's Illustrated
Medical Dictionary
by Dox, Melloni, and Eisner
People with
questions or comments can contact me at
http://www.greenerypress.com/ or
write to me at
P.O. Box 1261,
Berkeley, CA 94701.
Regards,
Jay Wiseman
|